个人中心
个人中心
2018.04.21 综合写作
重复
2013.01.13, 2015.03.14, 2016.07.02
大陆托福真题
【阅读主要观点提取】
总论点：1997年，美国许制药公司在媒体上做药品广告，评论家认为在电视里推销药品会对消费者有害。
分论点一：广告不会公正客观的阐述药品的影响，只会着重宣传药品好的方面，对药品可能产生的副作用只字不提。所以药品广告会误导消费者。
分论点二：如果药品在电视上做广告，销量会得到显著增长。评论家认为这种销量的增长是由于做了广告的药品被消费者滥用了。观众在电视上看到某种药品的广告后，会更倾向于使用此类药品。然而，他们如果使用那些没有做广告的药品会恢复得更快，或者他们的病情压根不需要服药就可以恢复。
分论点三：评论家认为政府没有很好的监管药品广告的内容。政府虽然已经对药品广告有了一定的规范，但这是不够的。评论家认为政府应该审核每一个药品广告，如果不这样做的话，有可能会伤害消费者的利益。
【听力主要观点提取】
总论点：很多人认为药品广告有很积极的作用。
分论点一：虽然药品广告可能不会完全客观，但这并不代表着观众不能进行客观的判断。广告只是告诉消费者有一种药品是十分有效的。消费者知道广告不是完全客观的，所以他们会自己在网上了解这种药品，也会询问医生这种药品的效果怎么样，最后对做广告的药品作出一个客观的判断。
分论点二：药品在电视上做广告后销量增加了，不是因为药品被滥用了，而是因为人们看了广告后，发现一种效果很好的药品。比如说，之前人们不知道有尼古丁贴片的存在，一旦在电视上做了广告后，人们就知道尼古丁贴片戒烟的效果是很好的，所以会去买它，销量自然就会上升。
分论点三：政府确实没有对每一个药品广告进行监管，但是药品公司不会轻易的违背政府制定的规则。因为如果政府收到消费者对某个药品广告的投诉，会让该药品公司支付大量的罚金。
【经典满分范文】
The writer points out that medication advertisements are harmful to the consumers. However, the professor demonstrated a contradictory idea that it plays a positive role in informing the public.
First, the professor refutes the viewpoint showed in the passage that television advertisements do not represent the effects of medications in a balanced and objective way by saying that the consumers would form a object view about the medication’s risks and benefits. It is because consumers would do their own research by surfing the Internet and discussing with their doctors.
Second, the writer states that if the medicine is advertised on television, its sales would rise dramatically. On the contrary, the professor makes the point that the sales rise due to people find out a good product that was little known before. For instance, people who want to stop smoking would use nicotine patches when the medicine is advertised on television. As a result, people will find that nicotine patches are very useful and the sale of the nicotine patches will rise too.
Finally, the reading material points out that some advertisements may harm consumers because the government dose not exercise enough control over the content of the advertisements. The listening, in contrast, holds a different view by stating that the government would punish the companies when they break the rules. If the government receives complaints about the pharmaceutical companies, they would be punished and pay a significant amount of money. So the pharmaceutical companies are not free to create and break rules.
